hi Matthew, On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their > >> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then. > >> > >> And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything > >> complex, it mostly moves code around, removes 'inline', > >> adds 'const'. What should I think about it? > > > > I'm waiting for an ACK/NAK from Hannes, the maintainer. What should I > > do? You could have informed me about this, and I would talk to Hannes myself. This would free up your mind from keeping track of this particular patch. Parallelize development, prevent things from being forgotten. Hi Hannes, > I haven't actually been able to test it here (too busy, sorry). If someone > else confirms it does it's job then > > Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> It's not in my mailbox on this machine, gladly we have lkml archived in the Net. Here is a positive tester report: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/168: ====================== Date Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:53:08 +0200 From Gabriel C <> Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers >> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23. >> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches. > > I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want. Works fine for me tested on : 03:0e.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m [9005:008f] (rev 02) Gabriel ======================= -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html