Re: possibly a dumb question about sb600/700

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:05:44 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I've been looking at PATA support for sb600 and 700 and found something
> weird.
> 
> * IDE atiixp.c has a separate entry for sb600 such that it only probes
> the first port but sb700 doesn't use the entry.  So, does sb600 has one
> PATA channel but sb700 has two?
> 
> * libata pata_atiixp.c doesn't have special handling for sb600's
> single-channeldness.  Is this okay?

Should be just fine as I understand it all anyway - the second channel
will have no resources assigned if absent which is handled by libata core
already.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux