Re: SC1200 failure in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc1-git10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, it works like that.

Seems in libata there is no fall-back to non-DMA mode, if DMA didn't work.

On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:31:39 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:44:31PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > Doesn't help
> > 
> > WRAP ~ #cat /proc/cmdline
> > console=ttyS0,38400n8 libata.dma_mask=3
> 
> It's "libata.dma" if its built into the kernel, or 'dma' module 
> option if built as a kernel module.
> 
> 	Jeff


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux