> CFA spec requires 848a in word[0], not 844a, which explains > why hdparm thought it might be ATAPI. I've updated my hdparm > source to detect this for hdparm-7.8 (unreleased). > That card (16MB) is definitely buggy. > But your other (1GB) card looks fine. > > Thanks. Somebody else may help with the libata issue. 848A is the preferred configuration value The use of 044A is also allowed in the case of it being non-removable. Guess someone got muddled up in the middle. 844A is a bit iffy and it should still be detectable as Word 83 bit 2 should be set ? As to the old IDE (not libata ?) issue - I suspect a convertor without DMA support as a first guess. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html