Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> - if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev) &&
>> - ((ehc->i.probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)) &&
>> - !(ehc->did_probe_mask & (1 << dev->devno)))) {
>> - ata_eh_detach_dev(dev);
>> - ata_dev_init(dev);
>> - ehc->did_probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
>> - ehc->i.action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
>> - }
>> + /* schedule probe if necessary */
>> + ata_eh_schedule_probe(dev);
>
> !ata_dev_enabled() got lost, is this intended?
Definitely not. Thanks a lot for catching this. Jeff, I'll post an
updated version. Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
