Re: [RFC/PATCH] libata and bogus LBA48 drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
	Hi Jeff,

A colleague noticed recent versions of Ubuntu no longer detect his 80 GB
ST380020ACE drive. This drive is special in that it advertises LBA48 support,
but has the lba_capacity_2 field set to zero (cfr.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/3/30/163).

Upon closer look, libata indeed doesn't seem to handle this case yet.
Below is an (untested) fix.

---
Subject: libata: Ignore bogus lba48 drives

Some drives (e.g. the 80 GB ST380020ACE) advertise they support LBA48, but have
lba_capacity_2 field set to zero. This causes the drive not being detected by
the libata driver.

Add a check for this to ata_id_has_lba48(), cfr. what is done in
idedisk_supports_lba48().

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
NOTE: Untested due to the lack of hardware

 include/linux/ata.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/ata.h
+++ b/include/linux/ata.h
@@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ static inline int ata_id_has_lba48(const
 {
 	if ((id[83] & 0xC000) != 0x4000)
 		return 0;
+	if (!ata_id_u64(id, 100))
+		return 0;
 	return id[83] & (1 << 10);
 }

Is there any hope of getting a dump of the IDENTIFY DEVICE page?

'hdparm --Istdout /dev/DEVICE' should do the trick, for either IDE driver or libata.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux