Re: [PATCH-RFC] (was: Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:24:32 +0400, Alexander Sabourenkov wrote:
> There appears to be a hardware bug in that it chokes on scatterlist
> if the last item is larger than 164 bytes.
> 
> The patch that follows fixes my problem on 2.6.22.
> 
> I can't think of a way to avoid second pass over scatterlist without
> duplicating code (ata_qc_prep() and ata_fill_sg() from libata-core.c).
> 
> 
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c	2007-07-09 03:32:17.000000000 +0400
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c	2007-10-27 17:20:03.000000000 +0400

Interesting, but can you please give more background information?
I.e., how did you determine the existence of this bug?

And please cc: the sata_promise maintainer on sata_promise patches.
(Hint: that's me)

And please choose a Subject: that makes it absolutely clear what
the post is about. "Sata Sil3512 bug" doesn't exactly sound like
something the sata_promise maintainer needs to look at.

Meanwhile I'll check the Promise driver(s) to see if there's
something about SG table formatting restrictions there.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux