From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) > I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when > the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy > interrupt won't be delivered while MSI is turned off (since the handler > isn't listening for the legacy interrupts). I'd guess this would cause > people to have their MSI-capable device kill their non-MSI-capable device > when they restore their laptop (and the shared interrupt fires and gets > stuck at just the wrong time). No idea if this is a real concern, but I'm > pretty sure that not all of those calls are recent. I don't think it's a real concern. > There's a couple of ATA drivers that look like they might be trying to > work around the same bug, but it's a bit hard to tell. It might be good to > have them use the quirk (or set the flag) because it's cleaner. I noticed these cases as well, and I would hope that Jeff would help out here using the infrastructure my patches created. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
