Frans Pop wrote: > Hi, > > On 15 August 2007 Tejun Heo wrote: >> You don't need to worry too much as long as errors are properly, >> recovered. All commands are retried and you won't lose any data. >> Please report if the spurious NCQ problem happens again. Thanks. > > I've just received a logcheck mail with another one. I have not seen any in > the time between my initial mail [1] and now, so this is the second > occurrence in 1.5 months. The message is slightly different this time. > > I'm currently running 2.6.23-rc8 + CFS patchset. > > kernel: ata1.00: spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x8 FIS=005040a1:00000004 > kernel: ata1.00: cmd 60/58:18:b3:56:bd/00:00:01:00:00/40 tag 3 cdb 0x0 data 45056 in > kernel: res 50/00:58:b3:56:bd/00:00:01:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation) > kernel: ata1: soft resetting port > kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) > kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > kernel: ata1: EH complete > kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 321672960 512-byte hardware sectors (164697 MB) > kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off > kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 > kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA Please post the result of "hdparm -I /dev/sda". Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
