Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:05:17 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have this problem only with XFS, and even with XFS it goes away
mounting with "nobarrier"...
This last is an interesting datapoint.
I wonder if libata has a generic problem with NCQ + FLUSH CACHE.
What happens if you enable the 'fua' module parameter? (libata.fua on
kernel command line, if built in)
it isn't supported here:
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Did you actually try my suggestion?
That message is normal, because libata defaults to FUA==off.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
