On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:38:43 +0200
Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2007-08-01 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Alan Cox wrote:
> >>> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
> >>> and stuff you find that ...
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
> >>> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
> >>> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> >>> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
> >> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
> >
> > Upstream
>
> Are you sure that 1740/1742 are 508x (GEN I)? According to these [1]
> pictures there may be a 6042 chipset (GEN IIe) placed onboard.
The ones I checked and the code used as a reference clearly indicate a
508x. I've had two reports of a TTI 0x23xx ID number which may perhaps be
a 6042 as it didn't appear to work with a 508x driver.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
