Re: Still having problems with sata_promise on all late kernels - shutdown too - BISECTED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:

http://www.fnarfbargle.com/CIMG1029.JPG (I have posted this screen
shot previously. It's still doing exactly the same thing on both
boxes).

git-bisect shows up this commit as the guilty party. I can't just revert
it on a recent tree though.
Will investigate further.
Weird.  Does 'hdparm -y /dev/sdX' work?
Very interesting indeed..

for i in /dev/sd* ; do echo $i ; hdparm -y $i ; done

sda-sdh worked fine.. sdi locked the box.

So it's dying on the 3rd or 4th controller.

That's weird.  You seem to have the same controllers and drives.  What
happens if you spin down from hdi upwards?


Any attempt to spin down sdi-sdo in any order locks hard. Any attempt to spin down sda-sdh works in any combination/permutation.

Yes, all controllers and drives are identical.

Brad
--
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability
to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable
for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux