Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
I acn undertand your complaint in the context of an OF driver (which we don't have yet) but "mmio-ide" just means nothing to the current driver, and it doesn't convery enough info on the programming interface for the conceivable OF driver, it also does need to know at least "reg-stride" (and maybe "reg-size" in case only 16/32-bit accesses can be used). Well, if such driver will be written, I/O mapping support will probably be dropped from it, so indeed, calling it mmio-ide.c would make sense. But that can be added when this driver is done, and for now
I don't think the details of what Linux code currently exists should drive the device tree binding. That the current patches use platform_device glue code is an implementation detail (and one I'd rather see go away, in favor of a driver that supports both platform_device and of_device).
I'd really prefer the board name to appear in the "compatible" prop (to which "mmio-ide" can be appended)...
Sure, that's always good... it was the "instead" that I objected to. -Scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
