Re: [PATCH] ahci: reimplement port_map handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Reimplement port_map handling such that
> 
> 1. Non-zero PORTS_IMPL value is always examined and used if consistent
>    with cap.n_ports.
> 
> 2. When PI and cat.n_ports are inconsistent, honor cap.n_ports and
>    force port_map to be ((1 << cap.n_ports) - 1).
> 
> 3. There were two separate places dealing with port_map.  Unify them
>    to one.
> 
> As all newer ahci chips seem to get PI correct and older ones usually
> have zero PI.  Controllers with holes in PI are very unlikely to screw
> up PI, so #2 makes more sense than following inconsistent PI.
> 
> Without this change, not setting ATA_FLAG_HONOR_PI when it's needed
> results in weird detection failure.  This changed logic should be able
> to handle all known cases correctly automatically.
> 
> Verified on ICH6 (reports 0 PI), ICH8 (with holes in port_map), ICH9,
> JMB360 and JMB363.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Jeff, SIS chips seem to require HONOR_PI flag for -stable.  I'll
> submit the patch as soon as it's verified.  For -upstream, I think
> this is much better fix.

Oh, forgot to mention.  Not sure whether mv6145 hack is broken by this
or not.  Please verify.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux