On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > ata-ahci-alpm-store-interrupt-value.patch > > > ata-ahci-alpm-expose-power-management-policy-option-to-users.patch > > > ata-ahci-alpm-enable-link-power-management-for-ata-drivers.patch > > > ata-ahci-alpm-enable-aggressive-link-power-management-for-ahci-controllers.patch > > > > > > These appear to need some work. > > > > seemed mostly OK to me. what comments did I miss? > > Oh, I thought these were the patches which affected scsi and which James > had issues with. I guess I got confused. Well ... my concern was really how to make them more generic ... ahci isn't the only controller that can do phy power management, and it also seemed to me that the most generic entity for power management was the transport rather than the SCSI mid-layer, but that debate is still ongoing. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
