Tejun Heo wrote: > > I like the whole series. Just a few nits. > > * 9 and 10 need to be oen patch. As it currently stands, compile will > fail after 9. > > * Please don't include "Patch n/10" in message body. > > * Add freeze/thaw to all, merge, kill freeze/thaw from all sequence is a > bit odd. It would be better if we can do things more directly but I > haven't thought about how that can be done too hard, so if it's too > difficult, it's probably not worth it. > > Alan, Jeff, I think we'll need to do what IDE has been doing for IRQ > masking to get acceptable PIO behavior after all and that will also make > us more resistant against deadly IRQ storms on controllers which don't > have pending IRQ bits (most SFF ones), and this change will ease our way > toward that direction. What do you guys think? > Thanks for the review/advice. Revised patches to follow. -- albert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
