Re: libata interface fatal error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Florian Effenberger wrote:
> sorry, it seems it was all a false alert and our mainboard was
> defective. At the end, it turned on only sometimes. To test it, we
> wanted to install Windows, which didn't work as well.
> 
> Now the dealer changed the motherboard, and we are just fine with 3.0
> Gbps and Kernel 2.6.21.5.
> 
> Sorry for the big confusion and for your great help! I didn't know the
> board was defective in the first place, there have been no indications
> like that...

Yeah, things like these are tricky.  SATA is usually the first one to
suffer from hardware defect including power fluctuation due to input
power, PSU or on-board voltage regulator problems because the link is
relatively long and runs at very high speed.  I also heard that SATA
cables should have been made more resistant to interference but I'm no
expert in that area.

It's interesting to see how it got solved.  Thanks for another data
point to blame hardware when I don't have a clue.  :-)

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux