Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> This patch cleans up libata-acpi such that it looks similar to other >> libata files. This patch doesn't introuce any behavior changes. >> >> * make libata-acpi functions take ata_device instead of ata_port + >> device index >> * s/atadev/adev/ >> * de-indent local variable declarations > > I prefer 'dev' over 'adev', unless that makes the code in question more > ambiguous. Alan is preferring adev over dev and I thought that might be better in the spirit of 'ap'. I don't really care about the naming tho. Will convert to dev. It won't increase ambiguity. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
