Re: nonzero mismatch_cnt with no earlier error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> 
>>I CC'ed linux-ide to see if they think the reported error was really innocent:
>>
>>Question: does this error report suggest that a disk could be corrupted?
>>
>>This SATA disk is part of an md raid and no error was reported by md.
>>
>>[937567.332751] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4190002 action 0x2
>>[937567.354094] ata3.00: cmd b0/d5:01:09:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 512 in
>>[937567.354096]          res 51/04:83:45:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> 
> 
> Command 0xb0 is SMART.  The device failed some subcommand of SMART, so,
> no, it isn't related to data integrity, but your link is reporting
> recovered data transmission error and PHY ready status changed and some
> other conditions making libata EH mark the failure as ATA bus error.
> Care to post full dmesg?

It is in the original thread on linux-raid, but here it is for this list.
This is the full dmesg. There were only MARKs in between.

I run a raid 'check' every Friday (cron). The last one reported some parity errors.

*** last week check start:
[927080.617744] md: data-check of RAID array md0
[927080.630783] md: minimum _guaranteed_  speed: 24000 KB/sec/disk.
[927080.648734] md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for data-check.
[927080.678103] md: using 128k window, over a total of 312568576 blocks.
	*** last week error:
[937567.332751] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4190002 action 0x2
[937567.354094] ata3.00: cmd b0/d5:01:09:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 512 in
[937567.354096]          res 51/04:83:45:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
[937568.120783] ata3: soft resetting port
[937568.282450] ata3: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
[937568.306693] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/100
[937568.319733] ata3: EH complete
[937568.361223] SCSI device sdc: 625142448 512-byte hdwr sectors (320073 MB)
[937568.397207] sdc: Write Protect is off
[937568.408620] sdc: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[937568.453522] SCSI device sdc: write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
	*** last week check end:
[941696.843935] md: md0: data-check done.
[941697.246454] RAID5 conf printout:
[941697.256366]  --- rd:6 wd:6
[941697.264718]  disk 0, o:1, dev:sda1
[941697.275146]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdb1
[941697.285575]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdc1
[941697.296003]  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdd1
[941697.306432]  disk 4, o:1, dev:sde1
[941697.316862]  disk 5, o:1, dev:sdf1
	*** this week check start:
[1530647.746383] md: data-check of RAID array md0
[1530647.759677] md: minimum _guaranteed_  speed: 24000 KB/sec/disk.
[1530647.778041] md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for data-check.
[1530647.807663] md: using 128k window, over a total of 312568576 blocks.
	*** this week check end:
[1545248.680745] md: md0: data-check done.
[1545249.266727] RAID5 conf printout:
[1545249.276930]  --- rd:6 wd:6
[1545249.285542]  disk 0, o:1, dev:sda1
[1545249.296228]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdb1
[1545249.306923]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdc1
[1545249.317613]  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdd1
[1545249.328292]  disk 4, o:1, dev:sde1
[1545249.338981]  disk 5, o:1, dev:sdf1

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
	attach .zip as .dat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux