Re: [PATCH] libata: implement and use ata_wait_idle_quiet()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > This makes spurious abnormal status messages seen in many sff
> > controllers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> My feeling is that this will also hide bugs, such as in the AHCI case

I think its the right thing to do in the end at least for the SFF cases
(can't comment on AHCI). Perhaps we should make that version printk to a
different printk level for now or if ATA_DEBUG is enabled ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux