Re: [RFC] libata IORDY handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>     I looked into fixing this but had a feeling that the thing wasn't right 
> from the very start, including ata_pio_need_iordy().  In my understanding of 
> the ANSI T13 stadrads, when one issues Set Features subcommand Set Transfer 
> Mode with sector count register of 0x8 thru 0xC this means that IORDY *must* 
> be enabled. 

Yes. It is more complex than the current code handles. That's one reason
I added ata_pio_need_iordy(), because it would need to change and
hardcoding it would be particularly ugly.

This will matter for supporting some utterly ancient junk.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux