On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 11:26 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Nah, but also set resource->end = 0 too and or-in IORESOURCE_UNSET for > > flags not (=) (or just set it to 0, I have no problem with completely > > clearing the resource, that will keep it out of the way) > > I get this output with the change below: > > Using INTC for W82c105 IDE controller. > W82c105: bn 0 dfn 19 > 00: f 0000000000000101 s 000000000000f000 e 000000000000f007 > 01: f 0000000000000101 s 000000000000f010 e 000000000000f013 > 02: f 0000000000000101 s 000000000000f020 e 000000000000f027 > 03: f 0000000000000101 s 000000000000f030 e 000000000000f033 > 04: f 0000000000000101 s 000000000000f040 e 000000000000f04f > 05: f 0000000000000101 s 0000000000000000 e 000000000000000f > 05: disable IO resource on W82c105 IDE controller > 06: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > 07: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > 08: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > 09: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > 10: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > 11: f 0000000000000000 s 0000000000000000 e 0000000000000000 > > If thats ok, I will submit a patch without the printk. If it works, I'm fine with it. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
