On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:45:27 +0000 "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew, > > You asked me to test if the issues I reported (Re: JMicron 20360/20363 > AHCI Controller much slower with 2.6.18 / Re: SATA CD/DVDRW Support in > 2.6.18? / Re: Problems with Samsung SH-W163A SATA CD/DVDRW JMicron > 20360/20363 2.6.18.1) were still present with 2.6.19-rc5, I tried it > today and ran into a very strange problem, the 4 400gb Samsung SATA > HDs connected to ata_piix were detected as normal but the raid that > they belong to failed to start, the raid system couldnt find any > superblock at all. You mean that the raid works in 2.6.18 but not in 2.6.19-rc5? Ouch. What sort of raid setup are you using? > Is it possible that the addressing of the sectors has changed such > that the device data structure does not map to the on disk data in the > same way as it did with 2.6.18.x ? Sounds unlikely. More likely we're reading junk from the disks. > unfortunately they drives are not > partitioned, just added straight to the raid, otherwise checking the > partition table would be a good test. > > I had a idea about taking a copy of a few kbs of data from each drive > using both kernel versions and comparing them, Good idea. > but if the raid is > started under 2.6.18 its possible the data would change anyway.. so I > dont think that would work. Do you actually need to start the raid under 2.6.18? Shut the raid down, take a copy of the first 32k of each disk, then boto 2.6.19-rc5 and do the same? > Any suggestions? I really want to complete testing of the two issues I > reported.. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
