Re: [PATCH] libata: fix ATA passthrough handling for ATAPI devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
libata used to pass all SCSI commands directly to ATAPI devices.
However, this is incorrect for ATA passthrough commands as they must
be handled by the SAT layer in libata.  Also, regardless of the
attached ATAPI device's supported packet length, SAT says that both
flavors of passthrough commands (ATA12 and ATA16) should work.

This patch makes the following changes to fix ATA passthrough handling
for ATAPI devices.

* implement atapi_get_xlat_func() and make libata handle ATA12 and
  ATA16 in SAT layer instead of passing it directly to the target
  device even if the device is ATAPI.

* Always allow 16byte CDBs for ATAPI devices.  This makes

This is definitely wrong.  Some ATAPI devices are limited to 12-byte CDBs.

Also, are we sure that no ATAPI device ever implements these opcodes?

Prior to the SAT spec -- which includes most ATAPI firmwares -- those opcodes might have been vendor-reserved space. Did you or Doug verify against the older specifications who might care about these opcodes?

Or maybe there is a flag somewhere we can abuse, that permits support of both scenarios -- passing the command to the device, and handling the command internally?

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux