Re: Question about Scsi error handling/recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fajun Chen wrote:
Hi,

I tested two SATA drives on the same controller (Sil3124) and found
that if their hotplug/unplug sequences overlaps, scsi layer will block
the use of any of the drives during error recovery phase.  So even if
one drive is recovered way early, it won't process any commands until
the error recovery  on another drive is completed.  Could someone
explain why the block is on controller/host basis instead of on port
basis? Is this because the controller could be reset during any error
recovery?

I don't think that's true. Each ATA port is represented as separate host to SCSI midlayer, so SCSI doesn't have any way to enforce such cross-port synchronization. In fact, libata needs to implement such facility to properly implement transfer mode reconfiguration on several controllers. What exactly are you seeing?

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux