On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:49:26 +0100, Jonathan Bell
<doggs.lay.eggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:43:18 +0100, Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
I cannot reproduce your problem here. Can you retest after running
the following commands?
# setpci -s 01:07.0 0c.b=04
# setpci -s 01:08.0 0c.b=04
I forgot something.
* You need to make sata_sil a module. Boot, unload sata_sil if loaded,
run above commands, load sata_sil and test.
* If above commands don't work, try =00 instead of =04.
Thanks.
setpci -s 01:07/8.0 0c.b=04 performed, sata_sil inserted...
md5sum crapped out again, similar errors in dmesg as before.
setpci -s 01:07/8.0 0c.b=00 performed, sata_sil inserted...
It worked...
cp ~/hugefile /mnt/sda1 && cp /mnt/sda1/hugefile /mnt/sdb1
&& md5sum /mnt/sda1/hugefile /mnt/sdb1/hugefile
ccf5f9052aa1fac3062c3f1920abb1fc /mnt/sda1/hugefile
ccf5f9052aa1fac3062c3f1920abb1fc /mnt/sdb1/hugefile
What does this register do, out of interest? With 00 it took ages and
made my load average shoot up to about 6.50!
Apologies for bumping this a mere 2 days later but I felt that progress
was being made...
Ok, so it's the PCI cache line size register... 08 means a value of 64
bits which corresponds to the line size of my L1/L2 cache, am I correct?
The fact that even with a value of 01 set (for fun) still corrupts the
file seems to indicate that the fault is somewhere there, but why? Should
I just give up and buy a decent mainboard? :P (currently running
A7N8X-Deluxe v2.0, latest 1008 BIOS)
I would like to know more about this since the only topics on PCI cache
line sizes I can find are ones where people are having problems.
Regards
Jonathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
