Re: [PATCH] ata-piix: kerneldoc-error-on-ata_piixc.patch 2nd try

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
I agree with all of these except #4.  Maybe you can reconcile your
preference with that in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which
contains:

<quote>
The canonical patch message body contains the following:

  - A "from" line specifying the patch author.
</quote>

A patch submitter should not need to know the patch receiver's
personal preferences and vary patches based on those.


It's not a personal preference. It's all based on git-applymbox, pretty much.

The SubmittingPatches doc should be updated to clarify that a From line is not needed in the email body, if it is the same as the From line in the RFC822 header.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux