Re: [PATCH 15/20] libata: move ->irq_handler from port_ops to port_info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] libata: move ->irq_handler from port_ops to port_info
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:43:51 -0400
Cc: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mlord@xxxxxxxxx, albertcc@xxxxxxxxxx, uchang@xxxxxxxxxx, forrest.zhao@xxxxxxxxx, brking@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1155977973478-git-send-email-htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1155977973478-git-send-email-htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913)

ideally we don't ever want to store info on the irq handler at all...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH 15/20] libata: move ->irq_handler from port_ops to port_info
  - From: Tejun Heo

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/20] libata: use LLD name where possible
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 16/20] libata: make ata_host_alloc() take care of hpriv alloc/free
Previous by thread: [PATCH 15/20] libata: move ->irq_handler from port_ops to port_info
Next by thread: [PATCH 11/20] libata: use remove_one() for deinit instead of ->host_stop()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems] [Linux SCSI] [Linux RAID] [Git] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Newbie] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux