On 9/11/06, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ar Llu, 2006-09-11 am 21:51 +0200, ysgrifennodd Jens Axboe: > Well, as I said, I don't think we ever saw a case that was demonstrably > due to the 256 sector issue. And I really don't think it is as obscure a > fact that people seem to think it is. One of the ones I've got saved here is this thread. Paul goes on to demonstrate that changing the 255<->256 limit makes 2.0/2.2/2.4 break or not break.
<snip> The whole thread is at http://lkml.org/lkml/2001/3/18/29 Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
