On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:47, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10 2006, Jason Lunz wrote: > > In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote: ]--snip--[ > > > > It's not surprising you're not getting many bug reports. It's common for > > several things to go wrong during s2ram, and the user often ends up > > looking at a hung system with a dead screen. It takes some quality time > > with netconsole to even begin to narrow down that it's IDE hanging the > > system, after which you can *begin* solving the no-video-on-resume > > issue. > > I'm not on any of the suspend lists, I was merely comparing the > suspend-others or suspend-libata ration to suspend-ide on linux-kernel, > and the latter is clearly in the minority. I've used ide suspend quite a > bit myself, and never had issues with it (or whichever ones I saw > initially, I fixed). Of course it depends very much on the hardware. I'd > still say that ide suspend probably supports a much wider range of > hardware, than does libata suspend. As far as the suspend to disk is concerned, you are probably right, but I'm not sure about the suspend to RAM. Greetings, Rafael - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
