libata iomap, PATA, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun,

Since you are poking around in this area, I wanted to remind you of the promise-sata-pata branch.

A problem with the current libata API is that probe_ent and related code does not easily permit two -vastly different- port technologies (SATA and PATA, in this case) to be driven by the same hardware. promise-sata-pata branch has not been merged because its solution is highly ugly.

A better solution will emerge when... you guessed it... probe_ent goes away, and host_set can be initialized directly. This allows the LLDD to directly configure host_set and associated ata_port structures to its needs.

There are also a few other controllers (SiS, VIA) which have similar SATA+PATA configurations to be supported.

	Jeff


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux