Re: [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
I see. For this patchset though, pulling pata-drivers that way would give it a small window of commits (probably just one) where pata drivers won't build properly. tj-pata-drivers was built by...

1. pulling #tj-upstream before removing old legacy handling
2. updating #tj-pata-drivers to use new legacy handling
3. killing old legacy handling in #tj-upstream
4. pulling again

Yeah, usually I fix up brokenness myself.  There is no perfect system :)


Such that pata-drivers doesn't fail to build after upstream merge. I won't make ALL branch from now on and tell you if merge needs some special ordering.

Yep, that sounds better.

	Jeff



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux