Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
From: Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:16:24 -0400
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Sander <sander@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607110926150.858@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602140439580.3567@p34> <44AEB3CA.8080606@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607071520160.2643@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200607091224.31451.liml@xxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091327160.23992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091612060.3886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091638220.2696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091645480.2696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091704250.2696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607091802460.2696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607100958540.3591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152545639.27368.137.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607101145030.3591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607110926150.858@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)

Justin Piszcz wrote:


opcode=0x35 & opcode=0xca


Those are non-DMA WRITE opcodes.  Using PIO for I/O is pretty rare these days,
so I'm betting that this is not a hard disk device -- compactflash?

-ml
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
  - From: Justin Piszcz

References:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Alan Cox
- Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
  - From: Justin Piszcz
- LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
  - From: Justin Piszcz

Prev by Date: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
Next by Date: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
Previous by thread: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
Next by thread: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems] [Linux SCSI] [Linux RAID] [Git] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Newbie] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Samba] [Device Mapper]