Re: [PATCHSET 6/9] new EH implementation, take 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




General comment:

My general feeling as I read these patchsets is that the patches are a bit /too/ split up.

I know its largely a judgement call, but don't be afraid to submit larger patches, particularly for new features like NCQ. The several patches are highly interdependent, and they are introducing new code, might as well just lump them together. Following the "one logical change per patch" rule doesn't have to mean "add one new function per patch"

	Jeff



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux