Re: [PATCH 09/15] libata-hp: activate hotplug by adding a call to ata_eh_hotplug() from EH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 17:45 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> zhao, forrest wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Now all the required pieces for hotplug support are in place.  Update
> >> all ->error_handler's to call ata_eh_hotplug() after regular EH is
> >> finished.  This enables hotplug support for all drivers which use new
> >> EH.  With this patch, all new EH drivers can do warm unplug and plug.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>  drivers/scsi/ahci.c         |    1 +
> >>  drivers/scsi/libata-bmdma.c |    1 +
> >>  drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c   |    1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> 5a9a286e07ca0d216be1b8f81ab6c6e7048ae963
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ahci.c b/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> >> index a8b699a..7f478c4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> >> @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static void ahci_error_handler(struct at
> >>  	ata_eh_revive(ap, action,
> >>  		      ahci_softreset, ahci_hardreset, ahci_postreset);
> >>  	ata_eh_finish_qcs(ap, qc, &tf);
> >> +	ata_eh_hotplug(ap);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static void ahci_post_internal_cmd(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-bmdma.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-bmdma.c
> >> index 3c3bc71..a87efae 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-bmdma.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-bmdma.c
> >> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ void ata_bmdma_drive_eh(struct ata_port 
> >>  	ata_eh_report(ap, qc, &tf, serror, action, NULL);
> >>  	ata_eh_revive(ap, action, softreset, hardreset, postreset);
> >>  	ata_eh_finish_qcs(ap, qc, &tf);
> >> +	ata_eh_hotplug(ap);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  /**
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> >> index 9acf7a4..1ca76f7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
> >> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ static void sil24_error_handler(struct a
> >>  	ata_eh_revive(ap, action,
> >>  		      sil24_softreset, sil24_hardreset, sil24_postreset);
> >>  	ata_eh_finish_qcs(ap, qc, &tf);
> >> +	ata_eh_hotplug(ap);
> >>  }
> >>  
> > 
> > Does it make sense to invoke ata_eh_hotplug() in ata_scsi_error()
> > instead of invoking ata_eh_hotplug() in each LLDD in order to
> > make code more general?
> > 
> 
> No, not really.  To do that we'll need another port operation
> ->hotplug(), which, I think, has no real benefits.

>From my understanding, in ata_scsi_error invoking
ata_eh_hotplug(ap); after ap->ops->error_handler(ap);
will do. No need to add ->hotplug() for port operation.
This way we avoid to invoke ata_eh_hotplug() in each LLDD.

Thanks,
Forrest
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux