Re: [PATCH 01/21] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:45:06 +0100
- Cc: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>, jianyong.wu@xxxxxxx, justin.he@xxxxxxx, James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <E1r5R2g-00CsyV-Ss@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
- References: <ZVyz/Ve5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <E1r5R2g-00CsyV-Ss@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Nov 21 2023 at 13:43, Russell King wrote:
> ---
> If the offline CPUs thing is a problem for the tools that consume
> this value, we'd need to move cpu_capacity to be part of cpu.c's
> common_cpu_attr_groups. However, attempts to discuss this just end
> up in a black hole, so this is a non-starter. Thus, if this needs
> to be done, it can be done as a separate patch.
Offline CPUs have 0 capacity by definition....
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]