Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:15:41 -0400
- Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <YrHgo8GKFPWwoBoJ@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
- References: <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220505182645.497868-12-ebiederm@xmission.com> <YrHA5UkJLornOdCz@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com> <877d5ajesi.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <YrHgo8GKFPWwoBoJ@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:15:47 +0200
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I assume (checked actually) the return 0 below from kernel/sched/core.c:
> wait_task_inactive() is where it bails out:
>
> 3303 while (task_running(rq, p)) {
> 3304 if (match_state && unlikely(READ_ONCE(p->__state) != match_state))
> 3305 return 0;
> 3306 cpu_relax();
> 3307 }
>
> Yet, the child task is always found in __TASK_TRACED state (as seen
> in crash dumps):
>
> > 101447 11342 13 ce3a8100 RU 0.0 10040 4412 strace
> 101450 101447 0 bb04b200 TR 0.0 2272 1136 kill_child
> 108261 101447 2 d0b10100 TR 0.0 2272 532 kill_child
> crash> task bb04b200 __state
> PID: 101450 TASK: bb04b200 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "kill_child"
> __state = 8,
>
> crash> task d0b10100 __state
> PID: 108261 TASK: d0b10100 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "kill_child"
> __state = 8,
If you are using crash, can you enable all trace events?
Then you should be able to extract the ftrace ring buffer from crash using
the trace.so extend (https://github.com/fujitsu/crash-trace)
I guess it should still work with s390.
Then you can see the events that lead up to the crash.
-- Steve
- References:
- [PATCH v4 0/12] ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop
- [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state
- Index(es):
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]