Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:27:56 +0200
- Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20190701093640.GA17349@linux>
- References: <20190527111152.16324-1-david@redhat.com> <20190527111152.16324-11-david@redhat.com> <20190701085144.GJ6376@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190701093640.GA17349@linux>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Mon 01-07-19 11:36:44, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:51:44AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Yeah, we do not allow to offline multi zone (node) ranges so the current
> > code seems to be over engineered.
> >
> > Anyway, I am wondering why do we have to strictly check for already
> > removed nodes links. Is the sysfs code going to complain we we try to
> > remove again?
>
> No, sysfs will silently "fail" if the symlink has already been removed.
> At least that is what I saw last time I played with it.
>
> I guess the question is what if sysfs handling changes in the future
> and starts dropping warnings when trying to remove a symlink is not there.
> Maybe that is unlikely to happen?
And maybe we handle it then rather than have a static allocation that
everybody with hotremove configured has to pay for.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]