On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 01:21:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Ok, that looks much better now with the second patch: > > ...even after a second reboot for verification. Great!( > > (...) > > I assume this won't affect UMA Itaniums or should I check on one of my > > other Integrities if this change breaks the kernel on them? > > Nice! I just assume we won't be able to use the patch "as is" as it would > potentially break other architectures if I'm not mistaken. It doesn't actually _break_ anything, but it regresses in not doing node local allocations. Give me some time to dig through the ia64 code to figure out if I can make sense of this.
|