Re: Regression in 543cea9a - was: Re: Kernel problem on rx2800 i2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/25/19 1:19 PM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> Instead.
> 
> Ok, that looks much better now with the second patch:
> ...even after a second reboot for verification. Great!(
> (...)
> I assume this won't affect UMA Itaniums or should I check on one of my
> other Integrities if this change breaks the kernel on them?

Nice! I just assume we won't be able to use the patch "as is" as it would
potentially break other architectures if I'm not mistaken.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux