Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND v7] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND v7] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:44:46 -0800
- Cc: kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx, dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20181124051223.19994-1-lijiang@redhat.com>
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
- References: <20181124051223.19994-1-lijiang@redhat.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
On 11/23/18 9:12 PM, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> These patches add the new I/O resource descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED'
> for the iomem resources search interfaces, and in order to make it still
> work after the new descriptor is added, these codes originally related
> to 'IORES_DESC_NONE' have been updated.
I'm having a really hard time figuring out what problem these patches solve.
What end-user visible behavior does this set change?
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
