Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:21:46 -0800
- Cc: "linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx" <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, "schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx" <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mattst88@xxxxxxxxx" <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, "ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "rth@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, "arnd@xxxxxxxx" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mark.rutland@xxxxxxx" <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, "marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FA127B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1451837157-447-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1451837157-447-7-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160104144643.GE1616@arm.com> <568AB65A.8030901@zytor.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FA127B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
On 01/04/2016 10:20 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> May I humbly ask why the [Finnish] you don't use the equivalent of the
>> x86 _ASM_EXTABLE() macro? In fact, why don't we make that one generic, too?
>
> I'm messing with that right now (with help from Andy Lutomirski and Boris) to
> add different classes of exception table (so I can tag some instructions as being
> suitable for fixup from the machine check handler). So it might not be generic
> for much longer.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145187079504846&w=2
>
I suspect that means we will also need to go back to arch-specific
sorting for x86.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]