RE: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> May I humbly ask why the [Finnish] you don't use the equivalent of the
> x86 _ASM_EXTABLE() macro?  In fact, why don't we make that one generic, too?

I'm messing with that right now (with help from Andy Lutomirski and Boris) to
add different classes of exception table (so I can tag some instructions as being
suitable for fixup from the machine check handler).  So it might not be generic
for much longer.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145187079504846&w=2

-Tony
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��&�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux