RE: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>, "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:20:50 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx" <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, "schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx" <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mattst88@xxxxxxxxx" <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, "ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "rth@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, "arnd@xxxxxxxx" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mark.rutland@xxxxxxx" <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, "marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <568AB65A.8030901@zytor.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1451837157-447-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1451837157-447-7-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160104144643.GE1616@arm.com> <568AB65A.8030901@zytor.com>
- Thread-index: AQHRRkC2t1KDXYSMXkO6qSborjeAo57r9w+AgAA52QD//3sIgA==
- Thread-topic: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
> May I humbly ask why the [Finnish] you don't use the equivalent of the
> x86 _ASM_EXTABLE() macro? In fact, why don't we make that one generic, too?
I'm messing with that right now (with help from Andy Lutomirski and Boris) to
add different classes of exception table (so I can tag some instructions as being
suitable for fixup from the machine check handler). So it might not be generic
for much longer.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145187079504846&w=2
-Tony
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��&�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]