On 9/5/2014 3:33 PM, wangyijing wrote:
Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c index 71bd161..01781a4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c[...]@@ -27,7 +27,17 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) return ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type); } -void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) +static void ppc_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
Shouldn't this function take IRQ # instead?
This function need to teardown all msi irqs of the pci dev, we should pass the pci dev as argument .
Ah, I've mixed up the teardown_irqs() method with teardown_irq()! Too similar. :-)
Thanks! Yijing.
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|