Re: [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 15/21] Powerpc/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
- From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:47:48 +0400
- Cc: Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnab.basu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bharat.Bhushan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1409911806-10519-16-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <1409911806-10519-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1409911806-10519-16-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
Hello.
On 9/5/2014 2:10 PM, Yijing Wang wrote:
Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure
MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
index 71bd161..01781a4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/msi.c
[...]
@@ -27,7 +27,17 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
return ppc_md.setup_msi_irqs(dev, nvec, type);
}
-void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void ppc_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
Shouldn't this function take IRQ # instead?
{
ppc_md.teardown_msi_irqs(dev);
}
+
+static struct msi_chip ppc_msi_chip = {
+ .setup_irqs = ppc_setup_msi_irqs,
+ .teardown_irqs = ppc_teardown_msi_irqs,
+};
+
+struct msi_chip *arch_find_msi_chip(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ return &ppc_msi_chip;
+}
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]