Re: [PATCH 2/2] kallsyms: handle special absolute symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> This forces the entire per_cpu range to be reported as absolute without
>> losing their linker symbol types. Without this, the variables are
>> incorrectly shown as relocated under kASLR.
>
> I like these patches, thanks!

Oh good! Glad this is getting closer. :)

> This one's a bit broken, since the zero-based __per_cpu_start/end thing
> is an x86-64-ism.  You really do want them relocated on other
> platforms, so I think you'll need do make this conditional via
> a --per-cpu-absolute flag to kallsyms (which x86-64 would set).

Ah, hm. Can this maybe just be dynamically detected (e.g. if
__per_cpu_start == 0?), I'd hate to have another arch run into this
glitch when we could "notice" it and deal with it instead.

> Dumb Q: why don't we actually present these symbols as absolute in
> /proc/kallsyms?  Seems like it would be clearer...

You mean set "sym[0] = 'A'" instead of the force_absolute thing I
added? It seemed like I shouldn't mess with existing information, and
as you say, they're not absolute on all platforms.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux