Re: [PATCH] ia64 sn xpc: Convert to use kthread API.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64 sn xpc: Convert to use kthread API.
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:00 -0600
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "<Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, rja@xxxxxxx, holt@xxxxxxx, dcn@xxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <462CE8D5.8040300@xxxxxxx> (Jes Sorensen's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:11:49 +0200")
- References: <m1slawn9eb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1176969574439-git-send-email-ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070422203647.GC23015@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <462CE8D5.8040300@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Like with the previous patch from Eric, I'm CC'ing the correct people
> for this patch (forwarded it in a seperate email). CC'ing irrelevant
> lists such as containers@ and not linux-ia64@ makes it somewhat
> difficult to get proper reviews of these things.
containers is actually relevant because everything not being converted
to a kthread API is actually show stopper issue for the development of
the pid namespace because of the usage of pids by kernel_thread, and
the apparent impossibility to fix daemonize to sort this out.
Now I do agree linux-ia64 is also relevant.
> Russ/Dean/Robin - could one of you provide some feedback to this one
> please.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]