Bernhard Walle wrote:
Hello Jes, * Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx> [2007-01-27 07:28]:"Bernhard" == Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx> writes:Bernhard> printk(KERN_NOTICE "Kdump not configured\n"); Wouldn't it make more sense to make that messages a bit more descriptive? Ie. include something about what it tried to do when it noticed it wasn't configured?Do you thinkmachine_kdump_on_init(): kdump not configured would be better? That would make it easier to find the position of the message in code. Or did you think of a more verbal description like
That would do just fine I think, anything to avoid having to run find and grep on the tree to figure out where it came from :) Cheers, Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|