On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:06:04 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I rewrote the whoe patch.. > > > > Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup > take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes. > Sorry....I noticed cpu-to-node relation ship should be fixed before onlining. About subject, I should be more carefull. > What I have now is: > > cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch > cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch > > I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that > these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc. > will do. > Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x? > yes, I do, becasue my system panics now at cpu onlining. Thank you. -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |