On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I rewrote the whoe patch.. > Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes. What I have now is: cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc. Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x? Please follow the guidelines in http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt a little more closely, especially regarding Subject:s Please bear in mind that I'm sitting on thousands of patches from hundreds of developers, that I process sometimes hundreds of patches per day and I am very easily confused. Retaining consistent and well-thought out Subject:s and referring to previous patches via their precise Subject:s really helps, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|